NASA Panel Signals Artemis Lunar Lander May Require 22 Starship Launches
A former astronaut on the safety advisory panel suggests the fueling campaign for the Moon mission could double previous internal estimates, raising questions about the timeline for crewed lunar returns.
By Christopher Reed ·

During its quarterly session held this week, the NASA Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel introduced a new data point that may reshape the financial and logistical outlook for the agency’s Artemis program. Charlie Precourt, a former NASA astronaut serving on the panel, discussed the risks associated with landing humans on the Moon, highlighting a specific metric that has long remained opaque to the public. The discussion centered on the quantity of rocket launches required to fuel a lunar lander, with Precourt’s remarks suggesting a figure of 22 Starship missions.
This number represents a significant upward adjustment from earlier internal gauges. For years, NASA has treated the required launch count as a closely held secret, often responding to inquiries with ambiguity. In 2023, Lisa Watson-Morgan, who then led the Human Landing System office, told reporters that while the agency had a general understanding, she was reluctant to specify the exact figure. She later characterized the estimate as being in the "high single digits to the low double digits," a range that implied roughly a dozen launches. Other officials at the time suggested the number could reach the "high teens."
The operational mechanics behind these numbers are complex. To execute a lunar landing, SpaceX must first launch a "depot" Starship into low-Earth orbit. This vehicle then requires multiple "tanker" Starships to refuel it with liquid oxygen and methane. Under the previous estimate of approximately 12 total launches, this would involve one depot and 11 tankers. The new suggestion of 22 launches implies a much larger fueling campaign, doubling the number of tanker flights required to fully load the depot for a trip to the Moon and back to lunar orbit.
The primary driver for the original, lower estimates was the expectation that SpaceX would significantly increase the lift capacity of the Starship rocket. Improved payload capacity would reduce the number of tanker flights needed to fill the depot. However, concerns are now growing among some NASA officials that these capacity improvements may not materialize soon enough. This delay threatens the goal of using Starship to play a meaningful role in returning humans to the Moon within the current decade.
The Artemis program’s success hinges on the reliability and frequency of these in-orbit refueling operations. Each additional tanker launch adds cost, complexity, and risk to the overall mission architecture. As the agency moves toward its next crewed lunar missions, the gap between the optimistic early estimates and the more conservative current figures is becoming a focal point for risk assessment.
Precourt’s comments during the panel meeting serve as a reminder that the technical challenges of the program are still being fully defined. While NASA does not publicly release detailed fueling manifests, the advisory panel’s scrutiny provides a window into the agency’s internal risk calculations. The shift toward a higher launch count suggests that the margin for error in the in-orbit logistics chain is tighter than previously assumed.
For stakeholders in the commercial space sector, the implication is clear: the volume of launches required to support a single crewed lunar mission may be higher than projected. This has direct consequences for launch cadence, infrastructure demands at launch sites, and the overall budget allocation for the program. As NASA continues to work with SpaceX to refine the Starship design, the final number may still shift, but the current trend points toward a more resource-intensive operation.
Source: Ars Technica


